R‑32 vs. R‑410A vs. R‑290: Which Refrigerant Is Right for Your Home?

If you're in the market for a new air conditioner or heat pump, you’re bound to run into three key refrigerants: R‑32, R‑410A, and R‑290. Each has its own set of pros and cons—performance, cost, safety, and environmental impact all vary. But with new regulations tightening the reins on older refrigerants, and newer tech rolling out fast, it’s more important than ever to know what you’re getting into before signing off on an install.

So let’s cut the fluff and unpack what really matters when comparing these refrigerants—based on the facts, not just industry jargon.

What’s a Refrigerant, and Why Does It Matter?

Every air conditioning and refrigeration system relies on a chemical that absorbs and releases heat as it cycles through your unit. That’s your refrigerant. For decades, the HVAC industry has used a variety of refrigerants—from the ozone-killing R‑22 (now phased out) to newer blends like R‑410A.

But not all refrigerants are created equal. Some are better at transferring heat, others are easier to recycle, and some have less impact on the climate. That’s why regulators like the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and international bodies like the Montreal Protocol have stepped in to push the industry toward low-GWP options.

This shift is where R‑32, R‑410A, and R‑290 come into play.

R‑410A: The Old Workhorse on Its Way Out

If your current AC system was installed in the last 10 to 20 years, there’s a good chance it uses R‑410A. It replaced R‑22 because it’s ozone-friendly—but it’s not exactly climate-friendly. Its global warming potential (GWP) clocks in at around 2,088, which is more than 2,000 times worse than CO₂ over a 100-year span.

R‑410A is a blend of two chemicals (R‑32 and R‑125), which makes it a zeotropic refrigerant—in other words, its composition shifts as it evaporates and condenses. That makes it harder to recycle, harder to recharge, and messier to work with overall.

While it’s non-flammable (a big plus for safety), it’s also heavier, less efficient than newer alternatives, and already facing phase-down mandates under the AIM Act. The EPA has published a timeline for HFC reductions that outlines how quickly refrigerants like R‑410A are being restricted—so expect fewer products using it moving forward.

R‑32: The Balanced Middle Ground

Here’s where R‑32 shines. First off, it’s not a blend. It’s a single-component refrigerant, so there’s no risk of fractionation—meaning it’s easier to charge, reclaim, and recycle. Its GWP is about 675, which is 67% lower than R‑410A, and it delivers better cooling per pound.

R‑32 systems are popping up in residential homes, commercial buildings, and even in some data centers, thanks to their high energy efficiency and manageable safety profile. While it’s classified as “mildly flammable” (A2L), its safety risks are low when installed by a trained technician. That’s why it’s already used in millions of systems worldwide—including over 160 million units in countries like Japan, India, and Australia, according to Daikin’s global refrigerant reports.

R‑32 is also becoming the refrigerant of choice for major HVAC manufacturers like Goodman, Mitsubishi, and LG, as they move away from R‑410A. Even Carrier has begun offering R‑32-ready units for North American markets.

R‑290 (Propane): Efficient, But Risky

Now let’s talk about R‑290, which is basically just highly refined propane. It has a ridiculously low GWP—just 3—and offers fantastic thermodynamic performance. It’s efficient, affordable, and already used in some commercial refrigeration units and specialty systems.

But there’s a catch.

R‑290 is classified as highly flammable (A3), and that raises serious concerns for residential use. Building codes and safety standards in the U.S. generally restrict how much R‑290 can be used in any given system—often capping it at around 150 grams. That makes it impractical for large split systems or whole-home HVAC setups.

Unless there’s a massive shift in how regulators handle residential safety, R‑290 is likely to stay in niche applications, not your living room.

Head-to-Head: How They Compare

Let’s lay out the key differences across four categories: performance, safety, environmental impact, and cost.

Performance

R‑32 beats R‑410A hands down when it comes to cooling capacity and heat transfer. You get more efficient compression, which means lower power bills over time. R‑290 performs even better—but it’s not widely compatible with today’s HVAC systems.

Safety

R‑410A is completely non-flammable, making it super safe to handle. R‑32 is mildly flammable and requires proper installation, while R‑290 is highly flammable and only allowed in small quantities in residential settings. According to the ASHRAE classification system, that places R‑32 in the “manageable with training” category, and R‑290 in the “handle with serious caution” tier.

Environmental Impact

This one’s easy. R‑290 has the lowest GWP by far, but R‑32 still significantly outperforms R‑410A. As Energy.gov notes, replacing high-GWP refrigerants with lower-impact options is key to reducing emissions as global AC use rises.

Cost

Initial equipment costs for R‑32 systems are about 5–15% higher than R‑410A models, but they usually come with higher SEER ratings, which means they save you money over time. R‑290 systems can be expensive and hard to source for residential use, and maintenance techs who can work on them are harder to find.

Which One Should You Choose?

If you’re installing a new system in a single-family home, R‑32 is your best bet.

It offers a solid balance of safety, efficiency, and environmental responsibility—without requiring niche parts or specialized code exceptions. And unlike R‑410A, it won’t be obsolete in five years.

If you already have an R‑410A system, don’t worry—you don’t need to rip it out tomorrow. But when it comes time to replace it, you’ll want to switch to an R‑32-compatible setup.

As for R‑290, unless you’re working in commercial refrigeration or you have a special use case that permits it, it’s not ideal for standard residential setups. It’s just not there yet for mainstream installs.

Wrapping It All Up

If you're shopping for a new HVAC system and want something that balances performance, safety, efficiency, and regulatory compliance, R‑32 is the standout. It's already gaining market share in the U.S., it’s easy to maintain, and it won’t tie you to a refrigerant that’s being phased out.

While R‑410A systems are still floating around, they’re essentially living on borrowed time. And R‑290, for all its green benefits, just isn’t practical for full-home cooling.

So do yourself—and your electric bill—a favor. Choose R‑32, get it installed by a certified tech, and enjoy the peace of mind that comes with a system that works smarter, not harder.

🧰Stay smart, stay comfortable, and I’ll catch you next time! - Mike🧰

Cooling it with mike

1 comment

Andy

Andy

Excellent article ! Just got a small basement dehumidifier and it’s charged with R-290, product is marked with Energy Star label. Don’t think I need R-290 in the house, it’s better used with the grill outdoors.
Thanks,
Andy

Leave a comment

All comments are moderated before being published